Reasons making Muslim Integration in Europe Impossible

  
 

By Dr. Muhammad Shamsaddin Megalommatis

12-8-2007 (http://www.americanchronicle.com/articles/34874)

http://www.buzzle.com/articles/reasons-making-muslim-integration-in-europe-impossible.html

In this article, we describe the existing Incredible Burden on the minds of the Europeans when trying to develop a theoretical approach to the issue of the possibility of social integration of the Muslim immigrants in the average European societies.

In an earlier article entitled ‘Integration of Muslims means Disintegration of Europe’, we evoked first the impossibility of politics devoid of Moral Principles, and we partly described the existing Incredible Burden on the minds of the Europeans when trying to develop a theoretical approach to the issue of the possibility of social integration of the Muslim immigrants in the average European societies. We enumerated five points, namely 1) Centuries long European Hatred of Islam, 2) Fallacious Academic – Intellectual Background and Fake Identity of Modern Europe (Hellenism), 3) Misperception of the World History through the Scheme West vs. East, 4) Execrable Disfigurement of the ‘Other’ (Orientalism), and 5) Demolition of the Ottoman Empire. In this article we will advance and describe other basic pillars that bear the aforementioned burden; without their most radical, drastic and irreversible removal, Europe will not avoid its History’s most thunderous crisis that is approaching with astronomic speed.

Point 6 – Tragic termination of the Islamic Civilization and Rise of Barbarism throughout the nominally Islamic territories

This a point of seminal importance; the event antedates the collapse of the Ottoman Empire, and even the arrival of Napoleon in Egypt in 1798. Of course, one cannot fix a date of death for a civilization that is not destroyed along with the destruction of the state where this civilization had strived. If we put an end to Ancient Elamite civilization at 640 BCE, this is due to the fact the Assyrian Emperor Assurbanipal destroyed Susa, the Elamite capital, invaded the entire territory of Elam, exterminated the entire population of the country, and even spread salt over the entire (unholy for the Assyrians) territory of Elam. But the Islamic Civilization, which was a multi-cultural phenomenon, not a national civilization, did not end like this. One of the main linguistic supports of the Islamic Civilization, Arabic, had gradually been decomposed (as early as beginning of the 16th century) into varied dialects, each of which was an amalgamation with other local languages. No other language rose to replace it, Ottoman Turkish, Farsi or Urdu. Even worse, the cultural – intellectual – religious sphere of Islam had been gradually corrupted by barbarizing elements that gradually got momentum.

This pertains to the nature of the Islamic Civilization that was born among nomads in order to culturally unify them with sedentary peoples. Islam – as attempted by Muhammad and Ali – was the cultural Aramaization of the Arabs, and in this way Islamization meant Cultural Des-Arabization of the Arabs. The phenomenon generated terrible cultural and religious ‘earthquakes’, and at the time of the rise of the Islamic (non Arabic, and rather Anti-Arabic) Civilization, there were sheikhs of Darkness who tried to turn Islam to Darkness, using structurally in their treatises traditional Aramaean rationalist philosophical methods; the most famous among them was Hanbal. He had limited effect during his lifetime; but when after some centuries, the Crusaders generated a shock in the terrorized Christian, Muslim and Jewish populations of the Eastern Roman and Islamic Empires, a follower of Hanbal, Ibn Taimiya, had it easy to advance an obscurantist, racist, and clearly more un-Islamic and anti-Islamic system that made of the Islamic Enlightenment, Philosophy, Sciences and Art its primary target, as it deliberately propagated the most venomous Barbarism in the History of the Mankind. His system started expanding until it covered and controlled the entire Islamic Caliphate from where it expanded further on, as it keeps expanding even now.

When the Darkness displaced Civilization within the Islamic Caliphate? This is the Date of Death of the Islamic Civilization. We cannot fix precisely a specific date, but many scholars agree on a day as the point-of-no-return, the moment at which the darkness of the illiterate and barbaric sheikhs was imposed on the Sultan of the Ottoman Empire.

1580: Islamic Civilization declared Dead

This date symbol is the destruction of the Istanbul Astronomical Observatory by the inhuman, barbaric and illiterate followers of the disreputable Satanist Ibn Taimiya and the sheikhs who propagated Darkness and Ignorance in their hatred against Knowledge. Established by Taqi Al Din Efendi, the world’s leading Astronomer, in 1543, the Istanbul Observatory was taken as model in the erection of the Royal Danish Astronomical Observatory that was built by Tycho Brahae. When in 1580 Taqi el Din predicted Ottoman victory over the Shah of Iran, and this event did not occur, the criminal followers of Ibn Taimiya and the bogus-Islamic theologians of Darkness provoked a manifestation of the ignorant masses who destroyed the Istanbul Observatory with the same hysteria the barbaric Arabic speaking masses of today demand the destruction of Israel. On that date was issued the Certificate of Death of the Islamic Civilization and Religion.

Point 7 – Formation of Pan-Arabism / False Identity and Language for the colonized masses

This point is not detached from point 5 (demolition of the Ottoman Empire); the latter was targeted so that the colonial rulers embark on the formation of a bogus-nation that would be permanently invalid and intellectually impotent. The different peoples targeted would therefore be totally unable to reach, perceive, establish, develop and subsequently take maximum benefit from their national and cultural identity, whereas through other mechanisms and devices they would turn out to be indelibly marked by a severe and most shocking complex of inferiority, involving parasitic-like hatred of the colonial master and at the same time immense self under-evaluation, servile docility to, thoughtless mimicking and deification of the colonial masters, absolute admiration and adoration of their supposed magnificent capacities, inane and immoral separation for the country where they belonged to (Ottoman Empire), plus hatred, pathological envy and betrayal of the Ottoman Empire.

The colonial creation of a mass of illiterate humanoids, labeled ‘Arabs’, consisted in the most monstrous strangling of:

  • a) the Berberic identity of the inhabitants of today’s Mauritania, Morocco, Algeria, Tunisia and Libya,

  • b) the Egyptian – Coptic identity of the inhabitants of today’s – permanently non Arabic and non Semitic – Egypt,

  • c) the Kushitic – Meroitic and Nilo-Saharan identity of the inhabitants of today’s Sudan,

  • d) the Yemenite (non Arabic) identity’s of the inhabitants of today’s Yemen and Oman, and

  • e) the Aramaean identity of the inhabitants of today’s Syria, Lebanon, Jordan, Palestine, Iraq (with the exception of the Kurds and the Turkmens), Kuwait, Qatar, Emirates, and the northern confines of Saudi Arabia, and of the so called Arabic speaking populations of today’s SE Turkey and SW Iran.

At the times of Napoleon, in the vast surfaces of the Ottoman Empire that France and England coveted, there were many languages and dialects evolving around Berberic, Coptic, Nubian, Yemenite and Aramaic (in the respective areas). Turkish and Arabic vocabularies were important components, as the first was the language of the administration and the second the language of the religion, but Arabic was already a dead language, and of course absolutely irrelevant of the various local cultures, namely Berberic, Coptic, Nubian & Kushitic, Yemenite and Aramaean.

If there had never been a colonial interference and involvement, throughout the aforementioned area, Berberic, Coptic, Nubian, Yemenite, and Aramaic would have been far more widely spoken today, as the hysterical and criminal effort to eradicate them would have occurred. In addition, there would be several other mixed languages composed of the various linguistic components, and there Turkish would be a very important constituent. If the Ottoman Empire had not lost its territories, there would never have been this fabricated bogus-language of Modern Arabic.

The tools of the "Mission Barbarisatrice de France"

The colonial French formed immediately the class of their interlocutors on whom they exercised a tricky mechanism: the quasi-illiterate pseudo-scholars of Al Azhar, a useless relic of Darkness that had nothing in common with the level of that university before 600 years, the few landowners and merchants, and the rising class of their servile servants for whom - idiotically - France was the undisputed leading force of progress.

They triggered the fabrication of an academic form of modern Arabic language that could not be identical to Classical Arabic of the Islamic Civilization Ages (but far poorer and more limited), and at the same time could not be similar to the extremely poor oral languages (which were amalgamation of various languages, mainly Coptic, Turkish and Arabic). And of course, it was meant never to become a mother tongue. The formation of the fabricated academic – journalistic Arabic covered the span of almost a century, and was directed against the Coptic and Turkish components that had to be expurgated. Due to the imposition of this fabricated language, the oral languages were influenced to some extent. But in order to hide the truth, namely that the Egyptians have absolutely no relation with the Arabs, and that there is not a single drop of Arabic blood within the Egyptian veins, the rising educational – academic – political class of colonized Egypt was injected with the idea that the oral language is an unimportant form of Arabic that must not be studied, but thoroughly and insistently disdained. And until now, there was never a single study of the oral language that was deprecated by those who use it, as this is the beginning of the servitude, the ignorance and the self-misery.

Abysmal French Hatred of the Coptic Civilization

Quite indicative of the monstrous and inhuman plan of the French to disfigure, totally destroy and disorient (arabize) Egypt is the fact that the Orientalist scholars built up two (successive) Museums of Egyptian Antiquities in Cairo, and one Museum of Islamic Antiquities, but no Museum of Coptic Antiquities.

Only the Copts themselves with great effort and great honor did contribute as community to the establishment of a Coptic Museum in Cairo. There is nothing strange in this. If one reads a few excerpts of Coptic Annals, one realizes easily that before and after the arrival of Islam in Egypt, the only, the main, the most diachronically excruciating problem of the Copts was the Roman and the Constantinopolitan perversion of Christianity and the inhuman political practices of the Roman Empire. Certainly, the French distortion of the World History would not like these pages diffused anywhere.

Pan – Arabism: dehumanizing, barbaric behavioral system

As it can be surmised through the aforementioned, Pan-Arabism has only very little to do with the latter day Arabic Nationalism that rose as political ideology in the 1910s and later. It has mostly to do with the formation of false feeling of national identity and the creation of a miserably low, lewd, vulgar, barbaric, and ultimately villainous behavioral system that was provocatively triggered through successive machinations by the colonial elite of France and projected on the colonized masses, long before the English prevailed in Egypt (1880).

If this Brutal and Criminal Societal Disfigurement of the detached Ottoman societies had not been so meticulously undertaken by the French, there would not have been a chance in the septillion for the British to convince the sheikh of Mecca to utter betrayal during WW I.

Point 8 – Methodic and perverse work of obliteration of the Berberic, Coptic, Aramaic and Yemenite Languages, Cultures and Identities

The French ignited the concept of arabization, as if an Aramaean of Syria could ever become an Arab, which is an oxymoron. The modern disciplines of Humanities had not advanced very much before 150 years, but still the American example was very clear: an African American, who having forgotten his original language became English native speaker, would never be (or be considered as) …. Anglos-Saxon.

In the African Atlas region, the most underdeveloped and neglected parts were the provinces where the arabization policies could not advance much. In Egypt, the Copts were put in front of the dilemma ‘elimination in Egypt or safety through assimilation in France’.

Among Arameans, the most targeted nation as the most pivotal hindrance in the disreputable arabization machination, the work took the iniquitous form of projecting other – totally irrelevant and absolutely false – national names for parts of Aramaeans that could be influenced through Vatican and missionaries.

False national names for Aramaeans: "Chaldaeans", "Assyrians"

Like this, some Aramaeans were taught that they are descendants of the Chaldaeans (portrayed as Babylonians, although the Kaldu were just an Aramaean tribe in Southern Mesopotamia), whereas others were offered facilities and monies to be possibly convinced that they were the offspring of the Assyrians who had all disappeared as early as the last years of the 7th century BCE.

Like this, for the first part in the World History, an entire people became the victim of national – spiritual trichotomy, as two misguided parts of the same people ("Assyrians", "Chaldaeans") have fallen victims of the malignant Anglo-French colonial plan, causing national division and disaster.

Yet, if the Aramaeans were united, they could convincingly explain to the Arabic speaking populations of Syria, Iraq, Palestine, Jordan, Iraq, etc, that they are not Arabs but linguistically only arabized Aramaeans, and that the best they have to do in order to achieve a coherent national and cultural identity is to learn Aramaic and obliterate Arabic.

Key point to help unveil the academic fathers of the Islamic Extremism

If you say this to a criminal French Orientalist, he will say to you that the linguistically arabized Aramaean cannot obliterate Arabic because he is Muslim. Through this answer, you get immediately and clearly the full and complete revelation of the Mystery of the Iniquity: the real creators of the Islamic Terrorism are the Colonial French whose plans would all be nil, if suddenly the modern bogus-Islam disappeared. Yet, the reality is simple: you don’t need Arabic to believe in Islam. You need Farsi, Turkish, Urdu. Somali, Swahili, many languages – but you don’t necessarily need Arabic.

The obliteration of the genuine culture of the illegally detached from the Ottoman Empire peoples took the form of unprecedented hatred and hysteria imposed through many sophisticated ways on the ignorant and besotted elites of these countries, who - through the machination of conflicts with the Ottoman authorities (provoked by the French but unfortunately undetected by these Ottoman citizens) - saw in France the savior whereas that pernicious country was the ultimate destroyer.

Prohibition of Phoenicia as National Name – instead of forged ‘Lebanon"

Even today, the ridiculous French Orientalists do not allow their Lebanese students, who besotted enough think possible for them to go and study in France, to publicize in the Museums in Lebanon the absolute Phoenician National Identity of that country.

All the inscriptions and the indications in all the Lebanese museums that shelter only Phoenician and Aramaic antiquities give explanations whereby the national name ‘Phoenicia’ is criminally absent. This is the trash that disreputable bogus-scholars, like my former professor at the Ecole Pratique des Hautes Etudes IVeme section, Maurice Sznycer, imposed through utter blackmail on their Lebanese students, who go to study in Paris in order to get a trash Ph.D. paper "bon pour l’ Orient".

Point 9 – Severe distortion of the National Histories of the illegally detached from the Ottoman Empire Peoples, matched with a multi-target confusion of the World academia

As the colonial conspiracy prepared the stage for local elites to idiotically think that it would be better for them to rely on the French than on the authorities of their own Ottoman state, many Algerians, Egyptians, Lebanese, Syrians and others started moving to France to study their History. There, the criminal and mendacious French academia, in total contradiction with methods applied in other, European, countries and students, they gave them a most distorted and broken picture of their national – Algerian, Egyptian, Lebanese, Syrian and other – History.

Basic element of this distortion was the discontinuity; at times the past, Egyptian, Assyrian – Babylonian, etc. was highlighted, then there were many confusing centuries of non – identity (through the bias of the erroneous term ‘Hellenistic Times’ that should be replaces by ‘Orientalistic Times’ because during that period Oriental cultures and religions, ideologies and cults, philosophies and esoterisms were diffused in Greece, Rome and throughout the Roman Empire), and then suddenly everything in the Orient was turned into the Arabic – Islamic, which also a very erroneous term).

Yet, the Late Antiquity, when the Oriental cults and philosophies prevailed throughout the West (Mithraism, Zervanism, Isidism, Hermetism, Anubism, Ostanism, Gnosticisms, Chaldeanism, Manichaeism, the Cybele circle of cult, the Atargatis system, and the Oriental Christian systems, Nestorianism, ‘Monophysitism’), consist in the ultimate backbone of every Oriental land’s history, as developments that took place in that period characterized the acceptance of Islam and the aspects of its implementation in the lands in question.

Breaking the continuity that brought Islam forth, the heinous and racist French academia help promote Islamic Extremism, a system of genuine misinterpretation of Islam – precisely through the bias of an-historicity, and de-historicity (as their supposed ‘Islam’ comes from nowhere and goes to nowhere).

Point 10 – Distorted representation of the Oriental and Islamic Past for average European, Western and World readerships

Linked with the aforementioned, the colonial academia prevented the correct information and the adequate interpretation of data pertaining to Oriental, Christian Oriental, and Islamic Antiquity from becoming widely available among Western readerships.

Who read a French translation and an analysis of the grand opus of the Aramaean philosopher Tatianus ‘To Greeks’, whereby the Great Aramaean trashes the supposedly important Greek philosophers as miserable copiers of Oriental thought, philosophy and wisdom?

Why are there in Europe more translations and books about Pericles and not Assurbanipal? Simply, because the hysteria of falsification and the hatred of the greatness were matched with the pathological love of the lewd, the low, the vulgar and The hideous. And an ignorant, tyrannical chieftain like Pericles (who ruled tyrannically over the 75% majority of slaves, also neglecting the Athenian women who were just ‘things’ to him) was thus preferred to an erudite Emperor – Philosopher – High Priest – Librarian and Connoisseur of dead languages (of his days: Sumerian).

Quite comically, the issue entered into school books’ and encyclopedias’ maps; you read about the Roman – Sassanid Persian rivalry! They do not show to you the Naqsh-e Rustam relief with Valerian kneeling in front of Shapur III, but they offer you a map of the adversary empires. Ludicrously enough the map starts with the Iberian peninsula and ends somewhere in the middle of today’s Iran. Yet, if they extended the map until Tibet and India, enough to show all the Sassanid territories, you would realize that the Sassanid Empire of Iran was greater, larger, bigger than the Roman Empire. Worse, located at the epicenter of the East – West desert, land and sea routes of trade, Iran was the Central Empire of the world, and ‘your’ Roman Empire was a marginal western story. This is the reality that the average Europeans never learnt, as they have been long date victims of the mendacious Orientalist academia of France and England.

If the criminal colonial academia of late 19th century France did not act in this way, they would feel that they ‘prove’ that the Sultan was superior to the Freemasonic President of the French Third Republic, and to Queen Victoria. The question is why other European nations with highly Humanist Traditions, the Germans, the Italians, and many others, should follow the inhuman practices and plans of the Anglo-French gangsters? As there many more reasons that generated the existing chaotic gap between the European populations and the Muslim immigrants in Europe, we will expand more on several forthcoming articles.